FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG

OCCUPY POLITICALLY

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Republicans push to overturn ‘net neutrality’ rules

The Raw Story

Republicans push to overturn ‘net neutrality’ rules

By Eric W. Dolan
Wednesday, March 9th, 2011 -- 4:59 pm

During a Communications and Technology Subcommittee Hearing on Wednesday, House Republicans pushed for a resolution to eliminate 'net neutrality' rules recently adopted by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

The 'net neutrality' regulations, approved by the FCC in December 2010, require internet service providers (ISPs) to allow their customers to have access all legal online content, applications and services over their wired networks and prohibit unreasonable network discrimination.

The new rules are meant to "preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet" but Republican critics have said the regulations amount to a "government takeover of the Internet."

"Today we have a hearing and markup on network neutrality and H. J. Res. 37, the resolution of disapproval I introduced to stop the FCC from regulating the Internet," Rep. Greg Walden (R-OR) explained. "There is no crisis warranting the FCC’s deviation from our historical hands-off approach. Rather than show an actual problem, the FCC relies on speculation of future harm."

Because Rep. Walden introduced the resolution under the Congressional Review Act, it only requires a simply majority in each chamber of Congress to pass and cannot be filibustered. In addition, the resolution cannot be amended.

"There is no crisis warranting intervention," House Energy and Commerce Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI) said in his opening statement. "The Internet is open and thriving precisely because we have refrained from regulating it.

"Imposing these rules will cause more harm than good by chilling the very investment and innovation we need to ensure the Internet keeps pace with the growing demands being placed on it," he added.

In contrast to Republican critics, Free Press Research Director S. Derek Turner claimed the 'net neutrality' regulations did not go far enough to protect consumers.

"Members of this body may be uncomfortable with the precise contours of the FCC’s rules," Turner said in his testimony to the committee. "Free Press, too, ultimately opposed the FCC’s final order because we felt that it failed to adequately preserve and protect the open Internet."

"But the passage of this Resolution of Disapproval will leave consumers completely unprotecte," he continued. "It will remove the FCC’s current weak, industry-blessed rules and prevent the FCC from addressing the most blatant forms of discrimination and anti-competitive activities at any point in the future."

Last week, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) vowed to eliminate the regulations during a speech at the annual National Religious Broadcasters convention.

"We’re going to do what we can to see that no taxpayer dollars are used to fund these net neutrality rules," he said.

No comments:

Post a Comment