Protect the Voting Rights Act rally at the SCOTUS, February 27, 2013 (David Sachs / SEIU / Creative Commons license)
With
mid-term elections fast approaching and the next presidential bid
seemingly around the corner, Republican lawmakers around the country
have ramped up efforts to restrict voting rules and regulations in ways
that favor GOP voters and discriminate against those who traditionally
vote democrat,
a report in the New York Times on Saturday highlights.
The battle, of course, is focused on swing-states where the stakes are highest.
GOP legislatures are systematically passing a string of bills that
"go beyond the voter identification requirements that have caused fierce
partisan brawls," as the
Times reports.
The
New York Times continues:
The bills, laws and administrative rules — some of them tried before —
shake up fundamental components of state election systems, including
the days and times polls are open and the locations where people vote.
Republicans in Ohio and Wisconsin this winter pushed through measures
limiting the time polls are open, in particular cutting into weekend
voting favored by low-income voters and blacks, who sometimes caravan
from churches to polls on the Sunday before election.
Democrats in North Carolina are scrambling to fight back against the
nation’s most restrictive voting laws, passed by Republicans there last
year. The measures, taken together, sharply reduce the number of early
voting days and establish rules that make it more difficult for people
to register to vote, cast provisional ballots or, in a few cases, vote
absentee.
Nine states have passed vote-restrictive measures such as laws
requiring voter IDs and proof of citizenship such as a birth certificate
or a passport. "Because many poor people do not have either and because
documents can take time and money to obtain, Democrats say the ruling
makes it far more difficult for people to register," the
Times reports.
A series of court decisions have emboldened Republican's efforts, including
last year's Supreme Court decision
to strike down a central provision of the 1965 Voting Rights Act,
allowing a number of mostly Southern states to make changes to election
laws without approval from the Justice Department—a restriction which
had been put in place to combat discrimination against minorities at the
polls.
"A few weeks later, free of the mandate and emboldened by a
Republican supermajority, North Carolina passed the country’s most
sweeping restrictions on voting," The
New York Times reports,
doing away with same-day voter registration, early voting, and "a
popular program to preregister high school students to vote" as well as
mandated strict photo identification requirements.
“What we see here is a total disrespect and disregard for
constitutional protections,” Rev. William Barber, president of the North
Carolina N.A.A.C.P. and leader of the Moral Mondays movement, told the
New York Times.
______________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
No comments:
Post a Comment