Through the corporate-funded American Legislative Exchange Council, global corporations and state politicians vote behind closed doors to try to rewrite state laws that govern your rights. These so-called "model bills" reach into almost every area of American life and often directly benefit huge corporations. ALEC is the heart and soul of the GOP.
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
While Glenn Beck disowns him, Obama just announced that he's reading
the Rough Rider's biography. John Avlon on how a former Republican
president helps define dysfunction in his own party.
While Glenn Beck disowns him, Obama just announced that he's reading the Rough Rider's biography. John Avlon, author of Wingnuts, on how a former Republican president helps define dysfunction in his own party.
Here's
how crazy our politics have become: Legendary Republican President
Theodore Roosevelt is being called a socialist by conservatives like
Glenn Beck. The man on Mount Rushmore, the Rough Rider president, is
getting caught up in a party-purity dragnet 91 years after his death, an
exaggerated symptom of the rabid hunting of RINOs—"Republicans In Name
Only"—that could tank the Grand Old Party.
If conservatives want
to kick TR out, Obama seems ready to welcome him in. As if on cue, the
president's press secretary, Robert Gibbs, announced yesterday that the
president is now reading the classic
The Rise of Theodore Roosevelt by Edmund Morris, a book that inspired Reagan's senior staff to tap Morris as their in-house historian during the 1980s.
Balance seems too subtle a concept for all-or-nothing absolutists.
Beck's departure point for his now-frequent attacks on our
26th president was a post-2008 election snide swipe at John McCain, who
he characterized as "this weird progressive like Teddy Roosevelt." In
his subsequent book,
Glenn Beck's Common Sense, Beck devoted a chapter to "The Cancer
of Progressivism" and lays the blame at TR's feet, in addition to
Roosevelt's rival Woodrow Wilson. It's a theme he has continued to hit
on radio and TV and speeches like his keynote address at CPAC—claiming
TR represents a road to "fascism"—because of actions like creating the
national park system, his anti-monopoly trust-busting and his support of
government interventions like the Pure Food and Drug Act. "It's big
government, it's a socialist utopia and we need to address it as if it
is a cancer," Beck said.
•
Edmund Morris: What Obama Is Learning From My Book It's
all part of a determined rewriting of history that casts any Republican
president not named Coolidge or Reagan as a progressive and therefore a
socialist determined to undermine the Constitution. Beck proudly
announces that he now uses a bust of TR as a doorstop in a symbolic show
of his displeasure.
This
history textbook rejection of the Big Tent is based on a misreading of
American history driven by ideological blinders that dumb down our
politics by dividing everything into not just right vs. left, but
conservatism vs. communism. Even during Teddy Roosevelt's time, a more
common-sense analysis characterized the divisions in America politics as
radicals, reactionaries, and progressives.
The radicals were the
far leftists who wanted revolutionary change—the anarchists, communists
and socialists that Roosevelt derided as "the lunatic fringe." The
reactionaries were the hard-core traditionalists and conservatives who
resisted all change—for example, the conservative Southern Democrats who
were determined to roll back Reconstruction with Jim Crow laws and
segregation.
Progressives, in this formulation, wanted responsible
change. As TR said, "constructive change offers the best method of
avoiding destructive change, reform is the antidote to revolution…
social reform is not the precursor but the preventive of socialism."
Beneath
this formulation lies larger fault lines in the Republican Party
between centrist reformers and conservatives that date back to a bitter
primary fight in 1912 between President William Howard Taft and Teddy
Roosevelt. TR won the primaries, was denied the nomination, split off
and formed the Progressive Party (aka, the Bull Moose Party). TR
believed he was fighting for the legacy of Lincoln against a "corrupt
alliance between crooked business and crooked politics"—and clarified,
"we draw the line against misconduct, not against wealth."
These
fissures surfaced again in the 1952 primary fight between Senator
Robert Taft, an isolationist who opposed intervention into World War II,
and General Dwight D. Eisenhower, who was called a "candidate of
effeminates" by conservative chickenhawk activists at the time.
President Eisenhower was later called a "dedicated, conscious agent of
the communist conspiracy," by the right-wing John Birch Society.
But
in an era of resurgent ideological absolutism, where the John Birch
Society is welcomed as a co-sponsor of this year's CPAC after a
half-century hiatus from movement conservatism, teeing off on TR in the
most paranoid terms is back in fashion among the increasingly
influential fringe.
It's a sign of how far our political debates
have been dragged off-center. For most of the past half-century, TR has
been the most popular ex-president, with dozens of biographies published
each decade, earning bipartisan praise as the model of an energetic
executive by almost every successor in the White House. This year has
already seen the publication of Douglas Brinkley's
The Wilderness Warrior and this fall Edmund Morris will complete his epic trilogy. Doris Kearns Goodwin's next book will also focus on TR.
History
is a neverending debate, but while everyone is entitled to their own
opinion, no one is entitled to their own facts. TR's contemporary
critics should ask themselves whether big-business monopolies represent
the triumph of free-market capitalism or its corruption—because open
competition, the essence of free markets, is protected by reasonable
regulation. When China's exportation of toys made with poisonous levels
of lead is rightly criticized by talk-radio hosts like Beck, it's worth
remembering that U.S. government regulations are what protect American
consumers from the same abuse. All government action is not a usurpation
of individual freedom—it's a matter of striking the right balance.
But
balance seems too subtle a concept for all-or-nothing absolutists,
especially when they are trying to lead a conservative populist revival
that characterizes centrist policies as a slippery slope toward
socialism and then communism. Rather than trying to purge Teddy
Roosevelt from the party rolls, today's GOP leaders would do well to
remember TR's example and his advice: "We Republicans must hold the just
balance and set ourselves as resolutely against improper corporate
influence on the one hand as against demagogy and mob rule on the
other."
No comments:
Post a Comment